Compounding This Week Newsletter from www.CompoundingToday.com
Brought to you by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical CompoundingHeader
August 13, 2010 Volume 7, Issue 33
  In This Issue
 
  About
  CompoundingToday
 
  Free Resources
 
  Subscriber
  Resources
IJPC Motar and Pestle Photo CD - 50 Images for $500

  Classifieds
To place a classified advertisement please contact: Lauren Bernick lbernick@ijpc.com or 405-513-4236
Kalchem International
 
Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph.d., R.Ph  Letter from the Editor
Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph.D., R.Ph.


Editorial: Thoughts about Health Professionals

There is no doubt that today most physicians, pharmacists, nurses, etc. are considered to be "professionals." One characteristic of a health professional is the requirement that decisions be made based on information at hand and a thorough consideration of all the options available at that point in time. This involves weighing the risks and benefits, safety, costs, adverse effects, potential long-term problems, and many other factors in our daily practice as health professionals.

However, what happens when the requirement for these choices and options are removed and one simply follows an algorithm (or a computer follows it for you) in the medical care of a patient or the dispensing/counseling of a patient's medication. When do the characteristics of being a professional disappear to the point that one becomes a technician?

It is quite apparent that today's third-party insurers have made great strides in the area of "pigeonholing" disease states, reimbursement issues, etc. The government has also done its fair share in reducing diagnoses, etc., down to "codes" that must be used for reimbursement, etc. Soon, much of this may be integrated for a "one-stop shop" from diagnosis to dispensing.

  • Will these categories continue to increase in number and complexity?
  • Will more categories be introduced earlier in the diagnostic process?
  • How will laboratory tests be fit into these processes?
  • Is it possible that once an examination is completed, lab tests results are input, that the outcome will then be the "diagnosis" for the patient with only certain approved drugs for that specific diagnosis?
  • Where is the "interpretation and the human factors that are oftentimes necessary for better patient care?

Before these algorithms become the central focus of medical care:

  • How much encroachment can be tolerated by health professionals?
  • What about the "ethics" of individual practitioners vs the computer?
  • Where are the "legal issues" when errors are made in the algorithms resulting in incorrect diagnoses and patient harm/death?

Who controls what, and who yields to the control when the government usurps the power of the health professional? Once the medical protocols are established by the government and the input is obtained, do we still have "health professionals" or do we have "health technicians"?

One problem, as we know in compounding, is that not all patients fit into "boxes" or "pigeonholes." In fact, there may be a significant percentage of patients that do not "fit." As an example, if about 10% of prescriptions are compounded for individuals for whom the commercial products do not "fit," that is a large number of patients that are impacted if the same percentage of individuals do not fit into the pigeonholes for diagnostic workups, etc., including individuals with multiple disease states, rare diseases, sensitivities and allergies, etc.

Where do the laws, regulations and standards fit in? Where does the federal government end and where does the state government begin? Government programs may benefit those that fit into a uniform set of descriptors; but everyone does not fit. We all know what happens when we are "outside the box" and try to get something done through a government agency!!! What may happen to the millions of patients that need specialized care and they are taken care of by "health technicians" instead of "health professionals"?

Just some thoughts to ponder�


Loyd V. Allen, Jr., PhD, RPh
Editor-in-Chief

 
Other News

Arsenal of Antibiotics Not Being Restocked
One sunny April morning six years ago, an 18-month old curly-haired toddler woke up with flu-like symptoms. By afternoon he was struggling for breath and went into septic shock. Hospital physicians gave him intravenous antibiotics, but the drugs failed and he was dead by the afternoon of the next day. He was the victim of a highly drug-resistant bacterium, MRSA.

We have come to expect that we can cure just about any infection; however, as we all know, bacteria can evade the drugs in our arsenal, and that arsenal is not being replenished with new antibiotics.

Drug companies seem to be abandoning the research and development of antibacterials, citing high development costs, low return on investment and, increasingly, a nearly decade-long stalemate with the FDA over how to bring new antibiotics to market.

Soon we could be defenseless against bacteria that can resist all existing antibiotics, which would mean more victims like Simon-dead from a staph infection that drugs used to conquer easily.

There is a regulatory impasse over whether drug companies seeking FDA approval for antibiotics should be required to run much more stringent clinical trials. The FDA says there are advances in the science of clinical trial design and they don't want to approve products that don't work.

However, the pharmaceutical industry and some infectious-disease specialists say the proposed rules will make it so difficult and expensive to gain approval for new antibiotics that the few remaining companies will abandon the field altogether.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-08-06/health/ct-met-antibiotics-crisis-20100806_1_
antibiotics-clinical-trials-fda-approval

Medicare's Fraud Cases Get Cold
The private sleuths hired by Medicare to investigate fraud don't seem to be that interested in hot pursuit. Many cases go cold, making it difficult to catch the perpetrators, much less recover money for taxpayers. A recent IG report revealed that out of $835 million in questionable Medicare payments identified by private contractors in 2007, the government was only able to recover some $55 million, or about 7 percent. It takes an average of six months for these companies to refer cases of fraud to law enforcement.
http://www.pharmacistelink.com/index.php/healthcare-legislation-regulation/21671

Pharmacogenetics Guidelines Available
The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry has new guidelines that address the use of pharmacogenetics, including therapeutic drug monitoring, in clinical settings. The document describes the pharmacogenomics of drug metabolism at the population level and gives rationales for genotyping to guide the use of warfarin, tamoxifen, atomoxetine, abacavir, and irinotecan.
http://www.aacc.org/members/nacb/LMPG/OnlineGuide/PublishedGuidelines/
LAACP/Documents/PGx_Guidelines.pdf

J&J Discloses More Subpoenas Over Consumer Recalls
J & J has disclosed that they have received multiple subpoenas from federal prosecutors related to repeated recalls of Tylenol and other consumer health products. The grand jury subpoenas request "documents broadly relating to" both the recent recalls of products made by McNeil Consumer Healthcare and inspections of two of the unit's factories.

The Fort Washington, Pennsylvania plant has been shut down since April due to multiple problems and is expected to remain shut until at least next summer.

The Lancaster, Pennsylvania plant is operated by a joint venture called Johnson & Johnson (J&J)/Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. The FDA inspectors noted many severe problems after spending 12 days there, from not following rules for manufacturing quality to poor record-keeping.

The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J has been under scrutiny by Congress, FDA officials, and others for eight recalls since September covering tens of millions of bottles of pain reliever Tylenol and other popular nonprescription medicines. The recalls also include some liquid medications for children.

The manager of the Fort Washington plant has since been fired, 300 of the 400 workers there will lose their jobs shortly and the fiasco led J&J to sharply reduce its 2010 profit forecast.

A recent July 21 FDA report on inspections at the Lancaster factory in the past month indicates a pattern of ignoring rules for manufacturing and quality, failure to investigate problems that could affect the composition of products, carelessness in cleaning and maintaining equipment, and shoddy record-keeping. In some cases, medicine batches made during equipment failures were not checked for quality. That factory makes nonprescription heartburn medicines Mylanta and Pepcid, plus Imodium for diarrhea.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article
/ALeqM5gKNufIGxLdxRyZ8TPAzFIe83oA1gD9HHH0UG0

Another Unintended Results of a Congressional Bill
Family and friends have suddenly found themselves blocked from shipping cigarettes and other tobacco products to American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq because of a new law meant to hamper smuggling and underage sales through the mail.

The Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 quietly took effect June 29. It cut off those care packages by effectively requiring that tobacco be sent with one particular kind of U.S. Postal Service shipping that requires a signature for delivery but does not deliver to most overseas military addresses.

Many soldiers do not have easy access to the stores on some Afghanistan bases that sell cigarettes and many do not keep a lot of cash while deployed; so, the only way they have to get cigarettes is through family members.

The law was created to prevent minors from ordering cigarettes through the mail and to prevent trafficking by requiring tracking and confirmation that the recipient is of legal age. It allows small shipments of tobacco products, but only via Express Mail because that's the only postal service product that meets the identification requirements under the law.

The issue is that Express Mail is not available to some overseas military destinations, primarily Iraq or Afghanistan. Families don't have any other options for shipping cigarettes. The law only affects the U.S. Postal Service because UPS and FedEx do not allow consumer-to-consumer shipping of tobacco.

The bill's sponsor said that the law did not intend to restrict mailing tobacco to soldiers, and they are looking for a resolution to the problem.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article
/ALeqM5ja-MWXjaW4gYKCXlY8rHboRpUUgD9HGK09O0

 
Did You Know...

�that one is not a pharmacist until after graduation from an accredited college/school of pharmacy; interns are "pharmacy interns," not "intern pharmacists"; students are "pharmacy students," not "student pharmacists"?

The designation "pharmacist" is earned; it is not simply applied to an individual enrolled in a course of study. Proper terminology is important when addressing health professionals and mentors. Students in medicine are not called "student doctors," they are "medical students." The same applies to pharmacy students and pharmacy interns until they earn the credentials to be called a "Pharmacist."

 
Compounding Tip of the Week

School Supplies
Many agencies and organizations provide school supplies for children, etc. Why not consider providing (optionally monographed) pens, pencils, rulers, etc. to your local organizations for distribution with the "back to school" packs for the kids.

Copyright 2010
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding, Inc.
122 N Bryant Ave, Edmond OK 73034
Reprints & Permissions: Reprints@ijpc.com
Manage my Email:
Subscribe / Un-Subscribe
Comments or Questions:
info@compoundingtoday.com