Editorial: Should the Government and Insurance Companies Pay for "Lifestyle" Drugs?
Should taxpayers and insured individuals "pay the bills" for those who, of their own choice, mistreat and abuse their bodies (e.g., alcohol abuse, tobacco abuse, STDs) to the point they are required to have healthcare, including medications?
Should taxpayers and insured individuals pay for drugs for ED, contraceptives, weight control, and other drugs that are taken for the "convenience and enjoyment" of the individual patient?
In summary, we have two different scenarios here; one where a conscious decision was made that resulted in serious health conditions, and the second, where the medication is not for a serious health condition but for the convenience, desires, or pleasure of the patient.
In other words, should taxpayers and insured individuals pay for drugs resulting from a poor decision made by an individual or simply because the individual wants something that is convenient and "enjoyable"?
This puts us in a very awkward position of wanting to care for those in need but at the same time realizing that it cannot be done indefinitely. We are empathetic, but at the same time we question how far it will go.
The original purpose of indigent health programs and insurance programs was to provide a mechanism for providing health care to those that really need it and couldn't afford it. Also, in the case of health insurance, they prepaid for health services through pooling of resources and sharing the risk. However, it seems that government programs and even some insurance benefits have gone far beyond "need" and are being significantly abused.
Many indigent programs are being abused by patients because they have come to the point that they feel it is their "right" and that they have a "right to free health care" (even though some do not even pay taxes), and the system is abused by the pharmaceutical industry because it is simply a mechanism for them to "sell more drugs."
It's about time that "enough is enough"! We cannot afford to pay for everyone's mistakes, desires, convenience, and pleasure!
If a patient has a serious condition or a patient is in real need of being treated so they can function as a productive member of society, then they need to be provided the proper care. However, how long can we continue to pay these escalating costs resulting in out-of-sight taxes and insurance rates? We cannot even afford to provide the care that has already been committed by the federal and state governments, and we stand a good chance of breaking the system so that care will not be available to any patients in the future. Things need to change so that we only pay for what is needed�not what is convenient, not what is desired, not what is pleasurable, and not what is resulting from seriously bad decisions. After all, if treatment is available, what motive is there not to make the bad decisions?
This is not meant to be calloused but a statement of reality and fact. There comes a point in time when individuals must own up to their own responsibilities and reap the benefits/consequences of their own decisions.
Loyd V. Allen, Jr., PhD, RPh
|