Headlines and news this week!
Federal Agencies say their rules pre-empt injury suits! [www.PharmaLive.com - Monday, March 31, 2008]. If a prescription drug causes injury, the FDA now says you can't sue the maker for injury if it met the agency standards! Not only is the FDA saying this but also the Consumer Product Safety Commission, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, etc. We already know the standards developed by different agencies of the government are not perfect, but this is a big blow to consumers; especially those that receive prescription drugs that have little choice in their selection. Consequently, these adverse events, including death, are going to occur and now the consumer has no recourse. Think about this as you read the following headlines from this week and refer back to last week's newsletter to the list of top 10 drugs causing deaths in recent years. It seems our agencies are not protecting consumers�they are prohibiting them from seeking damages in the event a flawed product is approved by "them" and causes harm! (Editors Note: This doesn't seem right. Think about this as you read the following.)
*Glaxo defends safety record of HIV Drug abacavir after publication of a report suggesting its use could increase the risk of heart attacks in the Lancet. [www.PharmaLive.com - Wednesday, April 2, 2008]
*FDA MedWatch-Singular (montelukast)-Possible association between use of Singular and Behavior/Mood changes, suicidality and suicide. [Pharmacist e-link - Monday, March 31, 2008]
*FDA MedWatch-Regranex (becaplermin) Gel study data suggest possible increased risk of death from cancer in diabetic patients using the product. [Pharmacist e-link - Monday, March 31, 2008]
*FDA MedWatch-Ziagen and Videx study data indicates a higher risk of heart attack in patients infected with HIV-1 and taking the drug. [Pharmacist e-link - Monday, March 31, 2008]
*A two-year-trial has shown that Vytorin and Zetia that block the intestine from absorbing cholesterol may do little to prevent heart attacks. Requests have been made to withdraw them from the market. The manufacturers, Merck and Schering-Plough, are accused of withholding negative results to boost sales. [www.PharmaLive.com - Tuesday, April 1, 2008]
Editors Note: The patients involved do not really have much of a choice in the treatments they receive. The "choice" is up to the physician, the managed care provider, the insurance company, etc. They are prescribed the treatment and:
1. If it doesn't work, they have no recourse for recovery of their costs involved!
2. If they experience an adverse event (including death), they now have no recourse for recovery of damages!
This is a bad trend because it appears no one wants to be held responsible for their actions. They strive for authority, but don't want responsibility! In pharmacy practice, it doesn't work that way. We ARE responsible for our actions over which we have authority.
Other News:
On another note, the pay for the Amgen CEO dropped 29% in 2007 following FDA warnings on 2 of its drugs; The CEO's compensation fell from $18.6 million to $13.2 million dollars! [www.PharmaLive.com] (Editors Note: How is the CEO going to afford to heat the swimming pool this winter? Maybe we should take up a collection?)
|