Editorial: Comments on the AMA Resolution
Just a few comments on the AMA resolution passed this week. The comments are divided into 4 parts as per the resolution:
AMA will call on the FDA:
(1) to conduct clinical surveys for purity and dosage accuracy of compounded bioidentical hormones;
The AMA is apparently unaware of the current standards for compounding according to USP Chapters <795> and <797>. The source of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is USP-grade chemicals, many from the same producer and same batches as those used in the pharmaceutical industry. Also, I'm not sure what is meant by a "clinical surveys for purity and dosage accuracy"? I would think this should be "chemical analysis for purity and dosage accuracy" of compounded bioidentical hormones. Chemical analysis is rapidly becoming routine in compounding pharmacies, so this has already been and is currently being addressed. Also, compendial requirements for compounded preparations are just as strict as for manufactured medications (generally �10%).
(2) to require compounding pharmacies to report adverse events and to create a registry of those events;
This has already been addressed with the USP MedMarx reporting system. It has been in operation for many years and compounders can report adverse events through this system.
(3) to require "uniform patient information" such as warnings and precautions on compounded bioidentical hormone products; and
Patient information can be drug and drug product specific and is not simple to put together. With all the dosage forms and combinations used in BHRT, it may be a challenge to come up with suitable information that is a one-size fits all. However, some pharmacists already do this and it is something that can be addressed at a national level, rather than having every pharmacy developing their own. This may be a suitable project for a national organization.
(4) to restrict pharmacies from using the term "bioidentical" to describe compounded hormone treatment.
The term "bioidentical" is perfectly proper. It simply means "life-identical" or hormones that are identical to those already in the body. Premarin cannot be advertised as a "bioidentical" hormone because it isn't one. However, some commercially available progesterone, testosterone, estradiol, etc. products can properly use the term in their products as they are "bioidentical." Does this mean that manufacturers could start using the term "bioidentical" but compounders could not?
The AMA is apparently unaware, or chooses to ignore, the tremendous advances in quality compounding and compounding standards that have occurred over the past 10-15 years. True, there may be a few (very few) errors made but then one must look at the "acetaminophen" recall of millions of commercial dosage units just last week as well as the drugs removed from the market after being FDA approved and taken by millions of patients. What are the priorities here? Something that affects relatively few patients or something that affects millions of patients? Quite possibility the AMA should be addressing their concerns to all the drug product recalls and requirements for Black Box warnings and "483s" related to poor manufacturing practices (of which Wyeth is a recipient).
The AMA also ignores the fact that pharmacy and medicine are professions established by the statutes of each state, or more simply stated-the profession of pharmacy and medicine are established by the states, and the laws and regulations are developed at the state level. If a federal agency (e.g., FDA) attempts to impact the practice of state-regulated pharmacy, they may also attempt to impact the practice of state-regulated medicine. According to some interpretations, physicians "break the law" every time they prescribe an "off-label" medication, which may impact over half of the prescriptions written. What will happen when a federal agency attempts to regulate states' physicians by telling them they can no longer prescribe for off-label uses unless they want to have possible charges brought against them by the FDA?
Just a few thoughts to ponder...
Loyd V. Allen, Jr., Ph.D., R.Ph
Editor-in-Chief |