Tip of the Week
Concerning the above question�probably not. As we know, according to USP Chapter <1112>, bacteria, yeast, and fungi will not grow and proliferate below a water activity (aw) of 0.60. What is an approximate "aw" of an example formulation using the worst-case scenario for demonstration purposes? Let's look at the actual percentage of water in the following formula, which is related to an approximate "aw".
Rx Morphine Sulfate Pentahydrate 50 mg/g in Nonaqueous Vehicle, Disp. 100 g
Note: The "g" was used in this example in place of "mL" as the specific gravity of the vehicle(s) will vary. If this was an actual formula, mL would be used and calculated appropriately.
(C17H19NO3)2.H2SO4.5H2O MW 758.83
MW of water = 18
18 � 5 = 90 = Weight of water in MS molecule
758.8 - 90 = 668.8 = Weight of MS without water
90/758.8 = 11.86% = % of water in molecule
However, the USP allowable range for Morphine Sulfate Loss on Drying is 10.5% to 13.4%, so we will use the worst-case scenario of 13.4%.
Morphine Sulfate 50 mg/g, 100 g Nonaqueous Preparation
50 mg/g � 100 g = 5,000 mg or 5 g Morphine Sulfate required
5000 mg � 0.134 = 670 mg water (max allowed by the USP in that quantity of morphine sulfate)
0.670 g / 100 g of mixture = 0.67% water present
Conclusion: The amount of water contributed by the pentahydrate in the morphine sulfate pentahydrate is negligible, and a 6-month BUD can currently be assigned to the formulation.
At issue is in the "proposed" USP <795>. This BUD will be reduced to 3 months, but the rationale is not explained. If the API is stable, and there will be no microbial growth, why not continue with the 6-month BUD?
|